And the water near the sky is better than having sky* gardern* water*Īgain: the most pixel are similar in the sequence, the better. That's because the sky* are 3 photos with minor difference among them compared with the garden* full of green. zip, I would simply use PPMD with the following options and leave everything else as set by the Compression Level: Archive Format: 7z Compression Method: PPMD Compression Level: Ultra I regularly compress server/text logs (60MB+) using these options and they usually come out at 1-2 of the original size. You would surely have a better compression renaming the file name so that the subject order was garden1, garden2, garden3, sky1, sky2, sk圓, water1, water2, water3.
Let's say you have a series of photos 1 to 9 with subjects snapped in this order: garden1, sky1, water1, garden2, water2, sky2, garden3, sk圓, water3. If you have a series of photos from your camera, they are quite surely already alfabetically sorted, but this doesn't automatically means they are well sorted for this purpose. The images were a series of backgrounds for websites sorted by pattern and by color. Just to highlight the result: I've compressed 900MB into 260MB! The compression is the maximum possibile when it's like having a video clip with little difference among frames. However the big deal, the real trick that makes a huge difference (when you can apply it) is sorting the images renaming their names of gathering them into directories so to have a sequence with the lesser graphic difference possibile amongst them. Jpg, png, and other kind of images are already compressed so there is tiny or no advantage at all in using a binary loseless compressor.Ĭompression Method: PPMD (instead of LZMA)
0 kommentar(er)
